Cass., 3 august 2016, no. 16278 (ord.)
The so-called “posthumous withdrawal” under consideration by the Court of Cassation
on Fallimento, 3/2017, pag. 305 segg.
The order
of the Court of Cassation comes after a conflict of case law on the substance -
recent examples of which are given - concerning the effects of the petitioning
creditor’s withdrawal after the adjudication in bankruptcy is pronounced. The
Court held that the so-called “posthumous” withdrawal is ineffective, with very
concise reasoning that does not reveal the logic behind the decision. The
comment offers an interpretation that, while agreeing with the decision of the
Court of Cassation, attempts to show that it is a necessary consequence of the
effectiveness of the adjudication in bankruptcy.